Mammografia
Kelaranta A, Toroi P, Timonen M, Komssi S, Kortesniemi M. Conformance of mean glandular dose from phantom and patient data in mammography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Apr;164(3):342-53.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25114321
Toroi P, Könönen N, Timonen M, Kortesniemi M. Aspects of forward scattering from the compression paddle in the dosimetry of mammography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013 May;154(4):439-45.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23034732
Ranger NT, Lo JY, Samei E. A technique optimization protocol and the potential for dose reduction in digital mammography. Med Phys. 2010 Mar;37(3):962-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20384232
Mammografiassa suorassa säteilykeilassa olevien pikselien signaalia voidaan käyttää annosmittaukseen:
Toroi P, Nieminen MT, Tenkanen-Rautakoski P, Varjonen M. Determining air kerma from pixel values in digital mammography. Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jun 21;54(12):3865-79.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19491454
Kompressiolevyn vaikutus dosimetrien kalibrointiin:
Hourdakis CJ, Boziari A, Koumbouli E. The effect of a compression paddle on energy response, calibration and measurement with mammographic dosimeters using ionization chambers and solid-state detectors. Phys Med Biol. 2009 Feb 21;54(4):1047-59.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19168939
Kompressiovoiman pienentäminen vähentää kipua, mutta annos kasvaa:
Chida K, Komatsu Y, Sai M, Nakagami A, Yamada T, Yamashita T, Mori I, Ishibashi T, Maruoka S, Zuguchi M. Reduced compression mammography to reduce breast pain. Clin Imaging. 2009 Jan-Feb;33(1):7-10
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19135922
Radiologisen dosimetrian ja tyypillisten annosten yleiskatsaus:
Huda W, Nickoloff EL, Boone JM. Overview of patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50 years. Med Phys. 2008 Dec;35(12):5713-28.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19175129
Tietokoneavusteisen diagnostiikan laaja yleiskatsaus:
Giger ML, Chan HP, Boone J. Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM. Med Phys. 2008 Dec;35(12):5799-820.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19175137
Rintasyövän diagnostiikkatekniikoista:
Singh V, Saunders C, Wylie L, Bourke A. New diagnostic techniques for breast cancer detection. Future Oncol. 2008 Aug;4(4):501-13.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18684061
Mammografian digitaalizoomaus ei korvaa perinteistä suurennuskuvausta:
Related Articles, LinksKim MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Son EJ, Youk JH, Choi SH, Han M, Oh KK. Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography? Eur Radiol. 2008 Aug 2.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18677486
Mammografian annosoptimointi:
Williams MB, Raghunathan P, More MJ, Seibert JA, Kwan A, Lo JY, Samei E, Ranger NT, Fajardo LL, McGruder A, McGruder SM, Maidment AD, Yaffe MJ, Bloomquist A, Mawdsley GE. Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography. Med Phys. 2008 Jun;35(6):2414-23.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18649474
Kontrasti-kohinasuhde ja rauhaskudosannos mammografian teknisessä arvioinnissa:
Muhogora WE, Devetti A, Padovani R, Msaki P, Bonutti F. Application of European protocol in the evaluation of contrast-to-noise ratio and mean glandular dose for two digital mammography systems. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;129(1-3):231-6.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18283065
CAD menetelmän sensitiivisyyden ja toistettavuuden tutkimus:
Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations. Radiology. 2008 Jan;246(1):71-80.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18096530
CAD menetelmän evaluointi:
Yang SK, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Cha JH, Kim SM, Kim SJ, Im JG. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Radiology. 2007 Jul;244(1):104-11.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17507722
Digitaalisen mammografian yleiskatsaus:
Van Ongeval Ch. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview. JBR-BTR. 2007 May-Jun;90(3):163-6. Review.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17696081
Hilan merkitys mammografian annokseen vakiokuvanlaadulla:
Gennaro G, Katz L, Souchay H, Klausz R, Alberelli C, di Maggio C. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography. Med Phys. 2007 Feb;34(2):547-55.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17388172
Optimaalinen säteilylaatu mammografiassa:
Young KC, Oduko JM, Bosmans H, Nijs K, Martinez L. Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography. Br J Radiol. 2006 Dec;79(948):981-90.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17213303
Digitaalisen mammografian nykytilan arvio:
Van Ongeval C, Bosmans H, Van Steen A. Current status of digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2006 Nov;18(6):547-54. Review.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16988574
Spektrin optimointi digitaalisessa mammografiassa:
Bernhardt P, Mertelmeier T, Hoheisel M. X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study. Med Phys. 2006 Nov;33(11):4337-49.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17153413
Digitaalinen mammografia:
Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ. Digital mammography. Radiology. 2005 Feb;234(2):353-62. Review.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15670993